1-310-784-1901

Category: Ball Comparisons

Hammer Envy Tour Comparison

Welcome to Fill The Frames Bowling Services’ ball comparison report of the Hammer Envy Tour. We continue to present more information to help you make a better choice in equipment replacements or additions.

Hammer Envy Tour 2.469 .034 .013 (45*x4-1/2”x35*)
Envy Solid 500, 1000 Siaair
Comparison to Hammer Purple Solid Reactive, Hammer Obsession Tour

This Hammer release will be the big control ball for cliffed league and flatter tournament patterns where controlling the friction is needed but there is conditioner in the heads. I started by using what is currently my lane reading ball, the Hammer Purple Solid Reactive. The theme you’ll see through this report is control. But control for different conditioner ratios, but shapes that are similar. 

Hammer Purple Solid Reactive 2.586 .027 (5”x30*)
Reactive Solid 500, 1500 Siaair

When Hammer announced this release late last year, I was excited to roll it. As we learned about this “experiment”, I knew this would be a ball as an option to my current lane reader- Hammer Raw Solid. I still use the Raw on occasion, but the Purple Solid has less diff so I get a better read from front to back as it pushes further down the lane, too. Cores are one thing, but matching the cover to get a motion is how anyone can build a workable arsenal. The cover is very adjustable, if needed.

Hammer Obsession Tour 2.469 .034 .013 (45*x4-1/2””x35*)
TourV2 Solid 500, 1000 Siaair

One of my favorite balls is the Hammer Obsession Tour Pearl. The motion is what I liked due to the core dynamics and the coverstock worked well at the centers in my area. For more volume, the Obsession Tour is the next choice where more flaring balls where too much Ex: Black Widow 2.0, Hammer Obsession (retired) or Hammer Envy. Smooth ball motion and controllability is where the Obsession Tour shines. Hand release changes can change the length through the fronts but off the friction the directional change was still manageable. It continues to be a tournament favorite for many styles of bowlers.

Hammer Envy Tour 2.469 .034 .013 (45*x4-1/2”x35*)
Envy Solid 500, 1000 Siaair

The Hammer Envy Tour uses the same Obsession Tour core, but changes the cover to the Envy Solid found on the stronger Hammer Envy released on 9/23/2022. The Envy Tour is the same shape as the Obsession Tour just earlier and can handle more volumes. Both box finishes are the same, but it’s the formulation that makes the motion distance difference visible. Bowlers who need more traction due to higher speeds but like to play straighter up the lane will like this release. Tournament bowlers where the fresh is very cliffed will be able to smooth it out and still have great hitting power. Bowlers with slower ball speeds and bowl on lighter volume patterns should look toward other options. I’m sure the cover can be adjusted, but to add more surface would give you’re a stronger directional change, just earlier and smoothing it out will push the ball a bit further down the lane. Personally, I am not a fan of polish. Polishing certain balls takes them out of their intent and there are other equipment choices. I see this ball being making the trip to the Open Championships this year in Reno and other tournaments.

BrandBallFeetFocal PointSet DownArrows42'Exit BoardPAP
5-1/4" x 1/4"up		Result
HammerPurple Solid Reactive246 pin1813920X5"30*X
HammerObsession Tour28Between 6/10221591845*5"25*X
HammerEnvy Tour30Between 6/10241992145*5"30*X
HammerEnvy Tour3310 pin272292145*5"30*X

The Hammer Envy Tour will be used a lot for tournament play. If you are not sure if it fits in your arsenal, ask your favorite shop or contact Fill The Frames Bowling Services.

As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. For more information, please visit the Coaching & Services page on our website at www.filltheframes.com or you may call or text messages to (310) 784-1901. Thanks, be well & safe!

Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services

Hammer Black Widow 2.0 Hybrid Comparison

Welcome to Fill The Frames Bowling Services’ ball comparison report of the Hammer Black Widow 2.0 Hybrid. We continue to present more information to help you make a better choice in equipment replacements or additions.

Hammer Black Widow 2.0 Hybrid 2.500 .058 .016 (45*x5”x25*)
HK22 – Aggression Hybrid 500, 1000, 1500 Siaair/Crown Factory Compound
Comparison to Hammer Black Widow Ghost, Hammer 3-D Offset Attack

Hammer adds the newest base formulation (HK22) to the Black Widow line. This gives a motion that will be sharper in the friction down lane. The 12 (RG 2.612) and 13 (RG 2.589) pound balls will have an alternate core (Diff of .043 and Asym of .011), but the motion will still be sharper based off the bowler’s release. You will notice that both Black Widows are drilled the same and the surface is their box finish that has been refreshed and cleaned. We added the 3-D Attack because it has the HK22 base formula and the VAL angle is slightly higher and the core is somewhat milder.

The Hammer Purple Solid Reactive (5”x30*) with slight lane shine was used as the lane reading ball.
Hammer Black Widow Ghost 2.500 .058 .016 (45*x5”x25*)
Aggression Pearl 500, 1000, 1500 – Siaair/Crown Factory Compound

The Ghost is cleaner than the 2.0 Solid. Again the engine is the Gas Mask core which is one of the strongest cores in the upper mid level balls of all time. The cover is stronger than a lower level pearl. Technology is moving the familiar Solid-Hybrid-Pearl step down in covers and shuffling it around with additives to give different response times to friction.

Hammer 3D Offset Attack 2.489 .053 .008 (45*x5”x30*)
HK22 – Neoflip 25 – 500, 1000, 1500 Siaair/Crown Factory Compound

We wanted to compare the different cores (close Diffs and ½ of the Asym diff) with the different pearl formulas but the box finishes are the same. Both balls with HK22 are a quicker response than other balls in their lines that are comparable. On a previous report the Attack was 7/7 left and more launch angle than the earlier Hammer 3-D Offset release.

Hammer Black Widow 2.0 Hybrid 2.500 .058 .016 (45*x5”x25*)
HK22 – Aggression Hybrid 500, 1000, 1500 Siaair/Crown Factory Compound

Personally what I see in my area on a daily basis is that the Black Widows are too strong for me without drastically changing the surface. This is due to the amount of conditioner put down, the age of the lane panels, my release specs, the covers and the strong Gas Mask core. 

I have been able to use Black Widows with the cleaner covers (BW Black & Gold), but not for very long due to transition. After drilling up the 3-D Attack and the Brunswick Defender Hybrid due to them having the new Brunswick HyperKinetic22 base formulation, I was excited to see what it could do for me in a Black Widow. As I tested and compared it, my hopes were confirmed. This release clears the fronts better, reads the midlane later and is sharper when it reads the friction. Even with this I still started deeper on fresh just like the bigger balls in my arsenal. I had to make room for the directional change (hook) down lane. In the graph below, you can see two different launch angles both resulting in strikes, The more closed angle was a high pocket strike but not a trip 4 pin. This showed me how much room was created off the pattern and carry was still present.

The Ghost was a little bit smoother and flatter going through the pins on the fresh. I moved into the volume a bit and added more tilt and rotation, but the Ghost still wanted to roll a bit too early. Usually if I have to move in, I have to adjust my release to get a ball to skid and recover harder (not a big zone change with more volume) as I did with the Ghost. I moved in and kept my more rolly release. The 2.0 Hybrid still cleared and reacted quickly at the end of the pattern. This gives me another ball reaction tool in the upper-mid line. Usually this is done on medium-light volumes and balls that are not as dynamic but still can create pop, Ex: Scorpion Sting or Ocean Vibe. 

The late high strike was with a more delayed release and I probably could have kept moving and adjusting angles and tested speeds. Another option when a “weaker” ball would clear but doesn’t make it back to the pocket. Since both finishes are identical, this clearly shows the difference in the base formulations. What was surprising (and I’m seeing it more often) is some formulations are producing length reactions different than what was the norm for so long. As always, watch your reactions and adjust accordingly. An info sheet can only tell you so much.

You can find more information about HK22 https://brunswickbowling.com/products/hyperkinetic22

BrandBallFeetFocal PointSet DownArrows42'Exit BoardPAP
5-1/4" x 1/4"up		Result
HammerPurple Solid Reactive246 pin1813920X5"30*X
HammerBlack Widow Ghost266 pin20148945*5"25*X
Hammer3-D Offset Attack32Between 6/10261782045*5"30*X
HammerBlack Widow 2.0 Hybrid3410 pin271971845*5"25*X
HammerBlack Widow 2.0 Hybrid34Between 6/102821112345*5"25*High X

I hope this report helps give you a better understanding between the new Black Widow 2.0 Hybrid, the Black Widow Ghost and the 3-D Offset Attack. Feel free to contact FTF with your questions. Please be specific, that way I can get you the best possible for you.

As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. For more information, please visit the Coaching & Services page on our website at www.filltheframes.com or you may call or text messages to (310) 784-1901. Thanks, be well & safe!

Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services

Hammer Purple Solid Reactive Comparison

Welcome to Fill The Frames Bowling Services’ ball comparison report of the Hammer Purple Solid Reactive.

The Hammer Purple Solid Reactive is the newest addition to the Mid-Performance line. To keep the comparisons more streamlined, I will be comparing the new releases to the balls that are closest to them in their current line. If that’s not possible, I’ll use a ball I believe is close from other lines.

Hammer Purple Solid Reactive – 2.586 .027 (5”x30*)
Comparison to Hammer Raw Solid, Hammer Purple Pearl Urethane.
The R&D department had an idea about using the same core as the wildly popular Purple Pearl Urethane and wrapped it with a solid reactive coverstock. This experiment created something special. You will notice that the core numbers have changed and this is due to the density of the solid reactive cover. This raises the diff and creates more flare and a stronger motion down lane. I have stated (my views) that urethane is not a good choice for certain bowlers. This could be dependent on their style, skill set and environment. The Purple Solid Reactive is a very good choice for those players and a great addition to any bowler’s bag. At the time of this writing, I have not seen a surface change from other staff members. This goes to the versatility of the ball itself.

Hammer Raw Solid – 2.537 .038 (4-3/4”x30*)
Currently the Raw Solid is my benchmark solid for daily use. It gives me a predictable ball motion and tells me where the friction is and a good idea on the length of a pattern. The layout used is on most of my syms so I can get really good feedback on the differences in cover/core from ball to ball. Getting lined up pretty quickly, you can see the differences in the grid below. I had less room moving in compared to the Solid Reactive as the Raw is a more rounded shape overall and responded slower.

Hammer Purple Pearl Urethane – 2.650 .015 (4-1/4”x25*)
The Pearl read the lane much earlier and rolled forward too long on this pattern. Urethane is used to control friction, on the back when other balls are too jumpy, when there’s volume up front but the pattern is shorter or for total ball motion control. Higher rev/speed bowlers have more success using this ball to me. Testing on a freshly oiled lane with some built in friction right of 10, I kept the Pearl straighter (see chart below). Pin carry was ok, but not optimum. Flare was less than 2” and limits scoring. This is why I don’t use urethanes for daily use.

Hammer Purple Solid Reactive – 2.586 .027 (5”x30*)
Simply put, this release is amazing! If you like a more smooth reaction and directional change off the pattern, the Hammer Solid Reactive is a ball you should look into. As I rolled the ball and kept moving in along with changes in hand positions, the ball kept clearing the heads and had the same readable motion down lane and makes it easy to read lane transition.  In the grid below you’ll see where I started and where ended striking as the ball seemed to find its limits for that day. The Hammer Solid Reactive will be a great addition/replacement to the majority of bowler’s bags. If you are looking for a quicker motion of the end of the pattern, I don’t believe polishing will add much more. There are better choices for that option. The Solid Reactive seems to blend out cliffs, which are seen a lot these days. This ball will be with me in both league and tournament play. 

Hammer Purple Solid Reactive Ball Comparison

BrandBallFeetFocal PointSet DownArrows42'Hand PositionPAP
5-1/4" x 1/4"up		Result
HammerRaw Solid256 pin18139R24-3/4"30*X
HammerPurple Pearl Urethane236 pin16139R24-1/4"25*X
HammerPurple Solid Reactive29Between 6/1022178R25"30*X
HammerPurple Solid Reactive3510 pin28218R35"30*X
Defining Terms:
Starting position: Instep of the slide foot. • Focal point: Swing projection toward the pins. • Set Down: Ball contacts the lane. Hand Position: 1 = Stable, more roll. Usually starting hand position on fresh. 2= Fingers rotated to the left a bit for more length and angle down lane. 3= More hand rotation at set up. Provides my max clearance through the heads and most of the midlane and creates the biggest change of direction when the ball reads the most friction and what the cover allows. S=Solid, H=High, T=Trip, F=Flat L=Light C=Crossover.

I hope this Comparison helps give you a better understanding with these 3 balls. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly your skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. For more information, please visit the Coaching & Services page on our website at www.filltheframes.com or you may call or text messages to (310) 784-1901. Thanks, be well & safe!

Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services

Hammer 3D Offset Attack Comparison

Welcome to Fill The Frames Bowling Services’ ball comparison report of the Hammer 3D Offset Attack

The Hammer 3D Offset Attack is the newest addition to the Mid-Performance line. To keep the comparisons more streamlined, I will be comparing the new releases to the balls that are closest to them in their current line. If that’s not possible, I’ll use a ball I believe is close from other lines.

Hammer 3D Offset Attack – 2.489 .053 .008 (45*x5”x30*)
Comparison to Hammer Raw Solid, Hammer 3D Offset
Everything about both of my 3D offsets is the same, with one fantastic exception. Using a new coverstock base material HyperKinetic22 (HK22), you will see a quicker response to friction on every ball that has it. Plus, it also brings out the colors more for great looking bowling balls. There are other balls in our lines that contain HK22 and you will see and hear the differences.

Hammer Raw Solid 2.537 .038 (4-3/4”x30*)
Currently the Raw Solid is my benchmark solid for daily use. It gives me a predictable ball motion and tells me where the friction is and a good idea on the length of a pattern. The layout used is on most of my syms so I can get really good feedback on the differences in cover/core from ball to ball. Getting lined up pretty quickly, you can see the differences in the grid below. I just noted this as a starting point for comparison to the much bigger Hammer 3D Offsets.

Hammer 3D Offset – 2.489 .053 .008 (45*x5”x30*)
Recently Hammer brought back an updated cover and the same core shape as the original from 25 years ago. This core was designed by the late Mo Pinel. It was a fantastic ball back then and the legacy continues today. While the asymmetry is not as high as other HP balls, this gives a ball a motion more subtle balance on med-heavy volumes.

Hammer 3D Offset Attack – 2.489 .053 .008 (45*x5”x30*)
Quick off the spot is exactly what the Attack gives. You can see in the chart below where I started and was close to the original 3D Offset and kept moving with the same release and different focal points. The original tended to skid too much when my feet got to 32. I did change to more tilt and rotation and was rewarded with too strong of a reaction. I’ll keep that in the back off my mind for another time. I see this ball as a step down from the Hammer Envy and maybe the top of my bag for daily use with my personal favorite, the Hammer Obsession Tour Pearl. Straighter players will see a sharper motion and I hope they move in and see what the Hammer 3D Offset Attack has to offer.

Hammer 3D Offset Attack Ball Comparison

BrandBallFeetFocal PointSet DownArrows42'Hand PositionPAP
5-1/4" x 1/4"up		Result
HammerRaw Solid256 pin18139R24-3/4"30*X
Hammer3-D Offset2810 pin21169R245*5"30*X
Hammer3-D Offset Attack29.510 pin23179R245*5"30*X
Hammer3-D Offset Attack3210 pin25199R245*5"30*X
Hammer3-D Offset Attack35Between 6/1028208R245*5"30*X
Hammer3-D Offset Attack35Between 6/1028208R345*5"30*X
Defining Terms:
Starting position: Instep of the slide foot. • Focal point: Swing projection toward the pins. • Set Down: Ball contacts the lane. Hand Position: 1 = Stable, more roll. Usually starting hand position on fresh. 2= Fingers rotated to the left a bit for more length and angle down lane. 3= More hand rotation at set up. Provides my max clearance through the heads and most of the midlane and creates the biggest change of direction when the ball reads the most friction and what the cover allows. S=Solid, H=High, T=Trip, F=Flat L=Light C=Crossover.

I hope this Comparison helps give you a better understanding between both 3D Offsets. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly your skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. For more information, please visit the Coaching & Services page on our website at www.filltheframes.com or you may call or text messages to (310) 784-1901. Thanks, be well & safe!

Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services

Hammer Scorpion Sting Comparison

Welcome to Fill The Frames Bowling Services’ ball comparison report of the Hammer Scorpion Sting. The Hammer Scorpion Sting is the newest addition to the Mid-Performance line. It has been designed to add more motion at the back end and compliment the popular Hammer Scorpion’s shape.

Hammer Scorpion Sting 2.485 .045  (4-1/2”x 35*)

Comparison to the Hammer Scorpion, Hammer Web Pearl (’21), Hammer Ocean Vibe

The Scorpion Sting is built with a new LED 3.0 core and the return of the Semtex Pearl coverstock. The core has a lower RG and a slightly higher diff. The addition of flip block will generate a clean path through the heads on medium volumes or as transitions happen in during a bowling session. A choice could be to go to a stronger cover/core combo, but that may be too strong. This depends on volumes in different zones. I see this ball close to the Web Pearl but adding more shape down lane than the Scorpion. If you don’t have a Web Pearl, the Sting would fit between the BW Ghost and the Ocean Vibe. Depending on a center’s oiling procedures, a bowler’s style and adjustment ability I can see this ball getting a lot of use for leagues by many bowlers. A slight surface change may open up the motion a bit very much like the Ocean Vibe. Always move around the lane to see what each ball has in terms of strengths and limits in addition to your adjustment abilities.

Hammer Scorpion 2.520 .043 (4-3/4”x 30*)

When the Scorpion was released, I was very interested to roll this ball. The combination of the updated LED2.0 core with the proven Semtex Hybrid cover would give me a similar rolling shape as the Purple Pearl Urethane. It was stronger and more forgiving than the Purple on a daily center’s pattern. Not a long rolling path, but a more controlled motion that is easy to read and make adjustments as transition happens. The Scorpion as a benchmark without too much surface allows me to read the fresh quickly. The drilling layout was close to what I have in the Scorpion Sting and I also refreshed the cover to 500/1K/2K Siaair.

Comparison: The Scorpion Sting is longer than the Scorpion and more angular (not sharp) off the end of the pattern. Same part of the lane shows a slight difference, but changing hand positions give the Scorpion Sting more hooking shape later down lane. I could move 5/3 in, change to a more angular creating hand position and open my angles and the Sting recovered and struck.

Hammer Web Pearl (Jade/Smoke) 2.481 .048 (4-3/4”x 30*)

My current favorite choice as a non solid, smoother cover benchmark ball to start with. It seems I can use this ball everywhere. Comparing the two, the Sting is a bit cleaner and a more rounded shape off the end of the pattern. On a pattern with more oil in the middle and some built in friction toward the channels, most out balls can be played in the same area through the heads. I believe there would be a more shape separation on flatter patterns with the Scorpion Sting being later in motion. 

Comparison: The Scorpion Sting is close to the Web Pearl.But my targeting and angles were more closed to keep it in the oil for the Web Pearl. Friction is the friend of the Scorpion Sting. A great choice if upper mids are too strong.

Hammer Ocean Vibe  2.510 .042 (4”x 35*)

If you bowl on friction or medium and lighter volumes the Ocean Vibe will do the job. While the response to friction is pretty quick, it’s not super fast. But the directional change will tell you where the friction is. This is another great addition to the Vibe legacy. When the ball hits too much volume, it tends to over skid. However, slightly adjusting the cover allow for more miss room. The Scorpion Sting will handle more volume than the Ocean Vibe and is very hand position friendly to change ball roll and motion.

Comparison: The Scorpion Sting will fit almost directly between a stronger pearl (core and cover) Black Widow Ghost and the Ocean Vibe. Almost gives you the best of both worlds at a great price point. Even though the Scorpion Sting and the Ocean vibe are in the same level, they are different and there is a price difference.

I hope this View helps give you a better understanding between balls in the past and current Hammer lines. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. Visit the Coaching & Services page on our website, email us at www.info@filltheframes.com or you call and text messages to (310) 784-1901.

Thanks, be well & safe!
Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services 

Hammer Envy Comparison

Welcome to Fill The Frames Bowling Services’ ball comparison report of the Hammer Envy. The Hammer Envy which is designed to be Hammer’s strongest ball ever. This comparison was done with the balls below and using Hammer Dark Web as a warm up and benchmark motion.

The pattern is 43’ that has 12:1 ratio with a moderate taper front to back and a strong drop off at 7 on each side with approximately 25mls.  My PAP is 5-1/4”x1/4”^ with low tilt at 6* and I’m considered matched rev rate to off the hand ball speed which is about 17.25 mph. All the noted core numbers are at 15lbs pre-drilled. I prefer to keep my drilling similar for comparison reasons. However, please check any changes. I will note if I would adjust the layout to what I believe would benefit the ball’s design.

Hammer Envy 2.505 .055 .021 (45*x4-1/2”x 45*)

Comparison to the Hammer Dark Web, Hammer Black Widow 2.0, Hammer Obsession

While the Obsession was the last HP ball for oil, this one is closer to the Redemption Solid in shape and it’s stronger and more continuous through the pins. Personally, I can’t use strong solid asyms very often due to my speed and the amount of friction I see most of the time. They have a tendency to roll forward of the back of the pattern and my reaction area is limited. However, I can use them on more volume and longer lengths. Out of the box, the surface cut through the freshly oiled lane and I was “here I go again”. After getting some shots in the ball did not weaken, but became more readable as it went down the lane. There was over 6” of flare and this proved the need for more volume for me to use it efficiently. With the new Launcher core, revving up was easy and progressively stronger throughout the ball motion phases. The Envy began to rev up just past the arrows and kept building. With the radical disc and the flip block opposing each other, the Envy had more directional change at the end of the pattern. With some hand position changes, there was more change of direction than I’ve seen at this ball level. I was seeing a ball reaction that I normally see in the upper-mid and mid Hammer lines on what we see on a daily basis. Touching the friction too soon will not give anyone (other than speed dominate bowlers) a good reaction. Bowlers who are speed dominate and has other equipment not read soon enough, the Hammer Envy would be an excellent choice. If you are a tournament bowler whose current arsenal struggles on higher volumes or is too jumpy on Sport patterns, the Envy should get a good look.

Hammer Dark Web 2.514 .048 (4”x35*)

Being on fresh the Hammer Dark Web might be a touch to strong for me with its box finish. The striking alignment was feet at 25, targeting 13 at the arrows and the focal point was between the 6/10. This kept the ball in the oil and didn’t touch the friction too soon down lane. 

Comparison: The Dark Web is smoother than the Envy and a great choice for daily volumes as a benchmark. The Envy struck at32/19/6.

Hammer Black Widow 2.0 2.500 .058 .016 (45*x5”x25*)

The cover of the Dark Web and 2.0 are the same Aggression Solid although the 2.0 is smoother (500/1K/2K Siaair) out of the box. Going back to the alignment of the Dark Web the move was 2/2 left to get to the pocket. Switching to the Envy I had to move (30/18/R10) and added axis rotation and tilt to see what the Envy could do. 

Comparison: The Envy would be a ball to switch to if the 2.0 quits when moving to more volume (and that’s saying something).

Hammer Obsession 2.468 .050 .013 (55*x4-1/2”x35*)

The coverstocks on the Obsession and the Envy are the same formulation (Envy Solid), however the Obsession had CFI (Carbon Fiber Infused) added. Since the Envy has a stronger core, Hammer adjusted the cover to get the motion they wanted. Both are box at 500/1500 Siaair Micro Pad. The number that stands out is the RG which comes in at 2.505 vs. the 2.468. The higher number usually helps the ball get further down the lane. This is where the balance of the core and cover hit the intended motion on the volume for most bowlers. Starting where I was lined up with the Dark Web (25/14/6-10) my move was (28/16/10) due to the strength of the ball.

Comparison: The Envy was stronger overall with recovery that was better even if it hits the friction earlier down lane. The Envy was 4/3 left.

I hope this View helps give you a better understanding between balls in the past and current Hammer lines. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. Visit the Coaching & Services page on our website, email us at www.info@filltheframes.com or you call and text messages to (310) 784-1901.

Thanks, be well & safe!
Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services 

Hammer Ocean Vibe Comparison

Compared to the Hammer Ocean Vibe, Hammer Raw Pearl & Hammer Web pearl

Another anticipated release on 07/08/2022 from Hammer Bowling is the Hammer Ocean Vibe. Many bowlers are excited to see the Vibe line reemerge and it was worth the wait. The pattern is a slightly bowled on (4 games with Solids) 42’ pattern that is approximately 8:1 ratio with a moderate taper. I have not been able to get the exact number from the center so this is my best guess. My PAP is 5-1/4”x1/4”^ with low tilt at 1.67* and I’m considered matched rev rate to off the hand ball speed which is about 17.25 mph. All core numbers are at 15lbs pre-drilled.

Hammer Ocean Vibe – 2.510 .042 • (4”x 35*)

Comparison to the Hammer Raw Pearl, Hammer Web Pearl ‘21. 
The ball that I based this report off is the Hammer Raw Solid 2.537 .038 (4-3/4”x30*)

After comparing the Hammer Dark Web and the Track Stealth, some of the conditioner was taken off the lane and board right of 8 started to open up. Starting with the Raw Solid again, I was 4/2 left (28/15) with a slightly closed angle to the focal point between the 6 and 10 pins than what I started on the fresh. A ball change was needed to get a better conclusion.

 Hammer Raw Pearl – 2.537 .038 • (4-3/4”x30*)

Switching to the Raw Pearl to compare pearl to pearl made the test easier. The Raw Pearl is drilled the same as the Raw Solid. The only difference is the coverstock and prep. The cover was transferred over from the Fugitive Pearl (as was the Solid) and is much stronger than entry level balls. I moved a bit right (27/15) and saw a cleaner motion in the same part of the lane. It was pretty easy to get to the pocket as a switch when the transition happened. The shape out of the pattern was rounded and makes adjustments simple. This made the Raws look like a good 1-2 punch for the money. Look into both, if you are in need of new equipment and budgeting.

Hammer Web Pearl ’21 – 2.481 .048 • (4-3/4”x30*)

Changing to the Web Pearl, it’s easy to see that this is a stronger pearl and core combo. I could move in gradually and open up the lane. The Web pearl was earlier and stronger in a direction change. I haven’t seen such a versatile pearl at this level in a long time.

Hammer Ocean Vibe – 2.510 .042 • (4”x 35*)

Fact: This ball is stunning just sitting on the rack. The Vibe was the most asked about release after the Black Widows. This will be a popular choice for all levels of bowlers. The coverstock is a pearlized version of the Orange Vibe cover and is very clean in the oil. The reaction shape is quick and angular when it finds friction. While I was using a more rolling hand position, the Ocean Vibe still had an angular motion. I changed my hand position to provide more rotation and tilt which did create more length. The Ocean went another 1-2” longer and had a great move out of the pattern. I could move into where I was with the Dark Web (34/20) and get a different ball motion. Personally, I would take the polish off to open up the hook range down lane and smooth out the reaction a bit. The Vibe core is a favorite for a reason and I can see why. While the Ocean Vibe is offered from 10-16lbs, the cores are changed in the 12-13lb range, but give similar number in the heavier counterparts. The 10-11lbs. will offer an option to bowlers who need lighter weights but want more than a polyester ball in motion. Paired with the Hammer Dark Web, any bowler will have a great 1-2 punch to get started in bowling or replace a ball or two. Talk to your favorite shop about the Ocean Vibe today!

I hope this View helps give you a better understanding between balls in the past and current Hammer lines. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. Visit the Coaching & Services page on our website, email us at www.info@filltheframes.com or you call and text messages to (310) 784-1901.

Thanks, be well & safe!
Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services 

Track Stealth Comparison

Compared to the Hammer Black Widow 2.0, Hammer Dark Web, Hammer Obsession Tour Solid

As you may know, I am an ambassador under the Hammer Bowling Brand. This comes with having the availability of using the other 6 brands under the Brunswick Bowling umbrella. These include the Brunswick, Columbia300, DV8, Ebonite, Hammer, Radical and Track brands. Every now and then I see a ball that would be a good fit for many bowlers due to it being unique or a replacement of an older release. So I ordered one to try it out. The Track Stealth is a ball that the brand hasn’t had in awhile- a big symmetrical at a great price point. I decided to compare it twice. Once on a slightly bowled on condition (Hammer Raw Solid starting ball) and on the same fresh condition the next day getting lined up with the Brunswick Knock Out. Saying I was pleased with the results in an understatement. Below are my observations. 

The pattern is a 42’ pattern that is approximately 8:1 ratio with a moderate taper. The first testing was done after the Hammer Dark Web comparison report after about 2 games on fresh. The second comparison with the Brunswick Knock Out and the Hammer Obsession Tour Solid was on the fresh. I have not been able to get the exact number from the center so this is my best guess. My PAP is 5-1/4”x1/4”^ with low tilt at 1.67* and I’m considered matched rev rate to off the hand ball speed which is about 17.25 mph. All core numbers are at 15lbs pre-drilled.

Track Stealth – 2.482 .056 • (4-1/2”x 35*)

First comparison to the Hammer Black Widow 2.0, Hammer Dark Web

With 2 games bowled, the Raw was still reading the lane very well. Standing 24, targeting with an open angle at 13 and a focal point of the 10 pin got me lined up quickly. Stronger covers in this center read well and being in the volume helps the ball shape out and the pin carry is very good.

 Hammer Black Widow 2.0 – 2.500 .058 .016 • (45*x5”x25*)

With the Aggression Solid cover and the most popular core for Hammer of all time (Gas Mask), the Black Widow 2.0 had me move quite a bit to 10/6 left of the Raw Solid. Changing to a hand position that creates some axis rotation, hitting the pocket and striking happened often. The 2.0 still wanted to change direction a little early in the midlane, so I switched to the Hammer Dark Web.

Hammer Dark Web – 2.514 .048 • (4”x35*)

Changing to the Dark Web kept me in the same part of the lane, but the core dynamics allowed for a cleaner motion through the heads and early mid part of the lane than the 2.0. The hook phase out of the pattern was perfect and made that zone look huge. As the lane transitioned a bit, I could keep moving in. Please check out my Hammer Dark Web comparison report. It is a ball all bowlers should look at.

Track Stealth – 2.482 .056 • (4-1/2”x 35*)

The cover was previously used on the Track Tactix solid that was released in September of 2018. I liked that ball a lot and wasn’t sure if it was the cover, the unique core or the combination or the two. The Track Stealth is a strong symmetrical that might be too strong for most house volumes without a surface change. Starting where the Dark Web was striking, the Stealth was almost as clean as the Dark Web but out of the pattern the still clean back ends had it stand up for me and didn’t create a lot of room. Closing down my angles slightly (31/19) with a focal point of the 6/10, the Stealth was very good. Again with this volume and with my base release, I would have to adjust the surface to something smoother and maybe add a touch of compound or polish. Had I bowled this year at the USBC Nationals, the Track Stealth definitely would have been in the bags. Higher speed bowlers will like the Stealth and bowlers who like a smoother shape and have trouble with Asyms on medium-heavy or higher volumes should ask about it at their favorite shop. 

On the next day fresh with the Brunswick Knock Out (4-3/4”x30* and lane shine for disclosure) I got lined up standing 23, targeting 13 at the arrows and with a focal point of between the 6 and 10 pins. The original Knock Out and the Raw Solid are my lane readers.

Hammer Obsession Tour Solid – 2.469 .034 .013 • (55*x4-1/2”x 35*)

The cover and core combo of the Obsession Tour is really good for a controlled motion on med-heavy volumes. Since the lanes were fresh, I could use it without over reaction on out of the pattern. Moving 3/1 left (26/14) and closing down the focal point to the center of the 6, striking was very good. A lot of the time, patterns that centers use make a lot of equipment playable in the same area, but with a shape difference. This is what elite bowlers look to adjust, getting the ball to go through the pins correctly to carry and monitor the motion from there as the competition goes on. I normally use the Hammer Obsession Pearl as my strongest ball on daily conditions.

Track Stealth – 2.482 .056 • (4-1/2”x 35*)

Changing to the Track Stealth, a bigger move on the approach and more open launch angle was needed. Once I got to 32 with my feet, targeting 18 at the arrows and the focal point moving to the center of the 10 pin, the pocket was found with consistency. I keep moving and adjusting my axis rotation and tilt and was surprised how the ball took to the changes and not burning up too early as long as I kept it in the volume. Early friction is not a friend of the Stealth, unless the bowler is speed dominant. The Track Stealth will be in my tournament bag with bigger Asyms. There are not a lot of higher volume conditions in my area unless the tournament calls for it. 

As stated above, on this volume, in this center, a surface adjustment could help greatly, but it would change the ball into something I currently have. I will keep it as is and keep the cover clean and refreshed. I did do a quick test to see how fast the cover absorbs oil. It was slightly over 4 minutes before most of the early flare had disappeared. This shows that for the Track Stealth to perform maintenance is needed and the uniqueness of the ball will keep bowlers happy. Never neglect to maintain your equipment.

I hope this View helps give you a better understanding between balls in the past and current Hammer lines. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. Visit the Coaching & Services page on our website, email us at www.info@filltheframes.com or you call and text messages to (310) 784-1901.

Thanks, be well & safe!
Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services 

Hammer Dark Web Comparison

Compared to the Hammer Web Tour Edition, Hammer Web Tour Edition Hybrid, Hammer Web Pearl ‘21

With the WWRD of 07/08/22, Hammer Bowling adds a new core to the Web series in the Hammer Dark Web. The coverstock is the same Aggression Solid that is found on the Hammer Black Widow 2.0. The 2.0 has a box finish of 500/1K/2k Siaair Micro Pad, while the Dark Web is finished at 500, 1500 Siaair Micro Pad. The new core is named the Modified Spheroid which has a flip block on the top of the body that will help increase overall ball motion. The pattern is a fresh 42’ pattern that is approximately 8:1 ratio with a moderate taper. I have not been able to get the exact number from the center so this is my best guess. My PAP is 5-1/4”x1/4”^ with low tilt at 1.67* and I’m considered matched rev rate to off the hand ball speed which is about 17.25 mph. All core numbers are at 15lbs pre-drilled.

Hammer Dark Web – 2.514 .048 • (4”x 35*)

Comparison to the Hammer Web Tour Edition, Hammer Web Tour Edition Hybrid, Hammer Web Pearl ‘21

The ball that I based this report off is the Hammer Raw Solid 2.537 .038 (4-3/4”x30*). As I warmed up, I found the Raw reading the lane very well standing 24, targeting with an open angle at 13 and a focal point of the 10 pin. Stronger covers in this center read early and being in the volume helps the ball shape out and the pin carry is very good.

 Hammer Web Tour Edition – 2.470 .030 • (4-1/4”x30*)

Due to the surface and formulation of the Web T.E., it was a bit earlier than the Raw Solid and more controlled because of the diff. Being on fresh, there was enough volume where I didn’t have to move. The motion was smoother and earlier than the Raw if I hit the lighter volume to the right early. Moving in and changing hand rotation had its limits and the T.E. wouldn’t recover, but it is designed for control.

Hammer Web Tour Edition Hybrid – 2.470 .030 • (4-1/4”x30*)

The same core in this ball is the same as the T.E. The Hybrid coverstock played better on the fresh with the same smooth ball motion but the cover allowed an easier, cleaner path to the breakpoint. Also a change in hand position allowed for more options and made the pattern very playable. A good option of fresh, however this ball is out of production.

Hammer Web Pearl ’21 – 2.481 .048 • (4-3/4”x30*)

The Web Pearl is a personal favorite. The coverstock is the same as the one on the Black Widow Ghost. A minor move left and moving my eyes in a bit gave the Web Pearl a great reaction. It’s more angular than both of the T.E.s due to the flip block and the Aggression Pearl cover. I wound up standing 27, targeting 15 at the arrows and the focal point was between the 6/10.

Hammer Dark Web – 2.514 .048 • (4”x 35*)

The Dark Web was clean while producing early revolutions. However, the core dynamics helped the ball get down the lane. Out of the pattern the motion was surprising for a solid. Not too rounded, not to angular. Again, if I hit the friction early to the right, the Dark Web would start its direction change too early. High speed bowlers will find the Dark Web to their liking. As I kept moving and adding axis rotation and tilt to prolong the reaction, I was able to get to 34, targeting 20 at the arrows and keeping the focal point at 6/10. The Dark Web kept coming and striking. I think I could have moved more before a flat 10 would have shown up. This release is very versatile and I can see adjusting the cover to any style a plus. This will slot under the Black Widows, but is not much weaker in reaction: just a shape change and more bowler friendly than large adjustments with the Gas Mask Core. I agree with other testers that the Hammer Dark Web would be a great go to ball in the Hammer line to start with. You may even stay in it longer than you think.

I hope this View helps give you a better understanding between balls in the past and current Hammer lines. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. Visit the Coaching & Services page on our website, email us at www.info@filltheframes.com or you call and text messages to (310) 784-1901.

Thanks, be well & safe!
Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services 

Hammer Black Widow Urethane Pearl Comparison

Compared to the Hammer Black Widow Urethane Solid, Black Widow Ghost & Hammer Purple Pearl Urethane

With the WWRD of 2/25/22, Hammer Bowling is excited to present the Hammer Black Widow Pearl Urethane. This time the cover is the same as the Hammer Purple Pearl but with the famous Gas Mask core. This report will have a new adjustment grid so it’s easier to compare ball to ball and the adjustments needed. All balls when tested were used with their box finish and cleaned regularly. My PAP is 5-1/4”x1/4”^ with low tilt at 1.67* and I’m considered matched rev rate to ball speed. The pattern is a fresh 42’ with more volume starting at 11 in. Outside of 6 tends to be a difficult starting point due to the topography of the center and less side to side taper. The track area opens up quickly and starting positions and angles need to be adjusted. The ball that I based this report off is the Hammer Scorpion (4-3/4”x30*).  

The Hammer Black Widow Pearl Urethane was tested after the Hammer 3-D Offset, Some of the head oil and midlane oil had been removed. So I brought out the Scorpion again to get lined up and adjusted my feet to 27, targeting 13/14 with the focal point between the 6 & 10. It also should be noted I changed my hand position for more axis rotation and a sharper back end motion. This is a 2/2 move left, opened the launch angle a bit, but the biggest change was the hand position. This happened very quickly in the span of 2 games bowling alone.

Hammer Black Widow Pearl Urethane (45*x5”x25*) – Hammer Black Widow Urethane Solid (55*x4-3/4”x30*)

The Black Widow Urethane Solid was designed for medium – heavy volumes up front and a strong mid lane reaction and had a box finish of 360/500/500 Abralon. Basically when this saw friction, it grabbed and started its rotational change of direction. Great for flatter patterns and control but with a stronger motion than the Purple Pearl Urethane. The Hammer Urethane Pearl uses the same cover stock as the Purple Pearl but has the Gas Mask Core. The drillings are close, but the numbers and cover would get the Solid to react earlier. The Pearl went about 3’ longer down the lane.

Hammer Black Widow Pearl Urethane (45*x5”x25*) – Hammer Purple Pearl Urethane (4-1/4”x25*)

Having the same cover, the differences would be the cores and surface prep. It’s Asym- RG 2.500 DIFF .058 Asym .016 at 360/800 Siaair vs. Sym RG 2.650 DIFF .015 at 500/1K/2K Siaair. The difference is in the layouts are minimal with the same VALs being used. If the Pin to PAP distances were the same the core and surface would still be the deciding factors on how early the ball starts up. The general ball motion differences in Syms vs. Asyms is Syms have a smoother longer hook zone compared to Asyms which have a quicker hook zone. With both these being Pearl Urethanes, it was apparent the BW was stronger and had a bigger move due to the core and surface. You can see by comparing the flare mages below. Surfaces can be changed a bit but if you are choosing a urethane, its best to keep it close to its designed surface or make another choice in equipment. While not a preferred choice for recreational of standard league patterns, both would have their place in a competitive bowler’s tournament bag.

Hammer Black Widow Pearl Urethane (45*x5”x25*) – Black Widow Ghost Pearl (Layout: 45×5”x25)

The difference between these two is just the cover stock and how they respond to the oil and friction. The Ghost does clear the fronts more than the BW Pearl Urethane and has a sharper change of direction. The BW Ghost surface is at 500/1K/1500 Siaair with Crown Factory Compound to help with the length. The Ghost is a great alternate when the stronger pieces start to burn up. I personally choose either the Ghost or the Obsession Tour Pearl. This depends on the shape that carries the pins better at the time.

As stated above, the first testing session was under a center’s fresh house shot. I decided to add another comparison on a different day. The center adjusted both lane machines and the pattern seemed to have less volume and the 6 and out was cleaner and able to be used by different styles of bowlers. Scores were reported higher throughout the week. During the test, it was obvious that the Black Widow Pearl Urethane needed more volume. The core is too strong and while the cover is a pearl it is urethane and the box grit is rough (360/800 Siaair). The ball got into a roll too soon and stood up as it got closer to the pins. This resulted in striking, flat 10s or 4 pins. There was little room to miss and get a string going. The change to be made for this and the first test would be to smooth out the surface. However, urethanes aren’t the best choice for recreational (house) patterns. There are other choices that benefit from the higher volumes in the middle and the drier boards towards the gutters. Flatter Challenge and Sport patterns where control of the friction is needed down lane is where this and most urethanes will shine. 

 

 

 

 

 

BrandBallFeetFocal PointSet DownArrows42'Hand PositionPAP
5-1/4" x 1/4"up		Result
HammerScorpion27Between 6/102013/149/10R3X4-3/4"30*X
HammerBlack Widow Ghost28Center of the 10
21

14/158/9R345*5"25*LX
HammerBW Solid Urethane29Between 6/10
2215/1611/12R255*4-3/4"30*C9
HammerBW Solid Urethane27Center of the 101911/128/9R355*4-3/4"30*LX
HammerBW Solid Urethane29Between 6/102114/159/10R355*4-3/4"30*FX
HammerPurple Pearl Urethane29Center of the 102215/1612/13R2X4-1/4"25*C10
HammerPurple Pearl Urethane32Center of the 102216/1710/11R3X4-1/4"25*X
HammerPurple Pearl Urethane32Right of the 102417/1813/14R3X4-1/4"25*X
HammerBW Pearl Urethane31Between 6/101912/1311/12R345*5"25*C6
HammerBW Pearl Urethane33Center of the 102216/1713/14R345*5"25*C3
HammerBW Pearl Urethane36Right of the 102415/169/10R345*5"25*4
HammerBW Pearl Urethane37Right of the 102414/159/10R345*5"25*HX
HammerBW Pearl Urethane37Right of the 103017/189/10R345*5"25*F10
HammerBW Pearl Urethane36Right of 63319/2013/14R345*5"25*LX
HammerBW Pearl Urethane36Right of the 103218/1912/13R345*5"25*LX
HammerBW Pearl Urethane34Between 6/102717/1811/12R345*5"20*LX
Hammer3D Offset33Center of the 102617/189/10R3

It is said and printed that urethanes are for “dry” lanes. I believe that this statement is incomplete and it brings confusion. If there is a general cliff in the pattern to start, urethane may smooth this out. Closed angles are beneficial and playing/controlling the end of the pattern could lead to a more consistent ball motion and adjustments would be less radical. Referring back to the comparison, the Purple Pearl and the BW Pearl Urethane have the same coverstock (at different box surfaces) but much different cores. You can see this by the images above. If the friction of the pattern or the center calls for control, starting with the Purple Pearl and switching to the BW Pearl Urethane may be an option. Since the Gas Mask core flares, it will help cut through any carry down that might have occurred with symmetrical urethanes. Surface adjustments may be changed per individual bowler, but it depends on the needs of that bowler and the environment that they are facing.

I hope this View helps give you a better understanding between balls in the Hammer line. As always, what you bowl on and more importantly you skill set will determine your choice in equipment. You can always contact me with any questions or schedule a consultation session on your current equipment. Visit the Coaching & Services page on our website, email us at www.info@filltheframes.com or you call and text messages to (310) 784-1901.

Thanks, be well & safe!
Juan Fonseca
Fill The Frames Bowling Services